The amount lost from Facebook to Twitter More Influential?

Daily active users Facebook reach 1 billion per November 2015 ago. Meanwhile, monthly active users Twitter is "only" reached 307 million in the third quarter 2015.
This means that Facebook penetration is much higher than blue bird logo services. However, the number of users was not proportional to the effect that the.
At least, experts believed that the Scot Hacker software and Digital Deputy Editor of New York Times Ashwin Seshagiri in a column titled "Twitter For Journalists".
According to Hacker and Seshagiri, Twitter is more capable when used for echo issue or make something viral on the internet.
It was not separated from the character of Twitter, which is based on the "interest graph". That is, the relationship between Twitter users is established based on common hobbies or interests.
"Twitter users to follow accounts that provide valuable information in accordance hobbies and interests them. Regardless they ever met or not," he stated in a column published in the official website of Advanced Media Institution University of Berkeley, US, and collected KompasTekno Thursday (17 / 12/2015).
Meanwhile, Facebook is more focused on "social graph". That is the relationship between Facebook users based on kinship.

Because "celeb twit"

On Twitter, the term "celeb twit" or stands for "celebrity Twitter". They spread to various sectors of interest. There is a focus on political issues, technology, fashion, to adolescent turmoil.

Called "celeb twit" because they account followed thousands to millions of followers who consider them credible and expert in one specific topic. Often, issues that twitt the celeb twit quickly become viral.
Compared with Facebook, the rarely terminology "celebrities Facebook". Because, from his character, the relationship between Facebook users is more equal and based "know each other".
Hackers and Seshagiri case study of the incidence of the death of Osama Bin Laden, in May 2011 ago. On that topic at that time, 4,000 tweets per second collected at Twitter.
That said the columnist, supported by the "RT" Twitter, which accommodates the news spread quickly with a simple display more information. In contrast to the "share," Facebook zoom considered less "breaking" and "real-time".
"Because of this amplification effect, Twitter has a closeness that is not owned by Facebook. A lot of big news first spread via Twitter. For banya events and crises, no one beats the effectiveness of real-time Twitter," the authors explain.

Share this post